Michael's Dispatches
Monkey Business: Our Broken Army
- Details
- Published: Tuesday, 20 August 2013 14:50
Manning's mental infirmities were no secret.
Before Manning’s crime, the Army removed the bolt from his weapon. This is a common practice in a war zone with soldiers who are deemed homicidal or suicidal. On some bases troops are never allowed to be without a weapon. The commander removes the bolt so that potential enemies do not see the troop is unarmed, yet this disables the weapon.
An odd similarity with Manning and Grisham is their fixation on homosexuality.
As for Grisham, his homophobia is severe to the point of being spooky. His blog "followers" can be similar in their spontaneous concerns about pedophilia and homosexuality. Gay bashing is always on their minds, like Mongolia. Others can be discussing economics when Grisham butts in with an elbow, "Let me tell you about why I hate Mongolia."
Russell killed five with a stolen M-16
In Baghdad, Army Sergeant John Russell was unstable. The commander took his bolt. Three days later Russell stole an M-16, and opened fire on troops, killing five at the stress clinic.
US Army Major and Psychiatrist Nidal Hasan murdered 13 Soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas.
Major Nidal Malik Hasan showed obvious signs of problems, and later killed 13 fellow Soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas.
Hasan wanted to kill as many random American troops as possible. He was on jihad and admits it, though our monkeys in charge tell a bold lie that it was workplace violence. He was in direct contact with al Qaeda.
Hasan continues to draw his government pay, about $300,000 since the murders, though he freely admits to committing the murders. We literally are paying an al Qaeda sympathizer if not operative. Justice has been twisted into something unrecognizable. Our “leadership” creates distress among the people by openly lying that this is workplace violence.
Some people believe that the Obama administration calls this “workplace violence” so that it can maintain that no major acts of terrorism have taken place inside the USA during his Presidency. It clearly was terrorism. Nothing can spackle over that.
Robert Bales
Staff Sergeant Robert Bales walked off his base in Afghanistan and committed mass murder. He killed sixteen people, including unarmed women and children. Was this also workplace violence?
All five Soldiers—Hasan, Manning, Russell, Grisham, and Bales—seem to share common traits: all were frustrated and enraged by what they felt was injustice. All sought vengeance. All radiated mental issues in advance that others noticed. As for Grisham, his habit of videotaping and publishing his escapades should be enough alert his command that something is off.
Result so far: 34 dead, dozens wounded, national security compromised, prestige of the Army severely damaged. Five bad apples pulled this off. This is the tip of the iceberg for the Army. The actual list is huge. The death toll is unknown.
One soldier is running free looking for gay zombies at Starbucks, in between his alleged Boy Scout activities. His commanders do nothing. Move along.
Key question: why is the US Army disproportionately represented in these cases? All other service branches combined do not bring this level lunacy to the table.
Is it combat? Hasan had no combat deployments. Manning had no combat experience.
Hasan was an Army psychiatrist with no tough deployments behind him. His job was in part to spot people like Manning, Bales, Russell, and gay-zombie hunters, and yet he was one.
Hasan was in no position to alert on monkey business while he was swinging from branches himself. That people above Hasan did not remove him before the mass murder is stark evidence of yet a larger troop of monkeys higher in the tree.
The Army leadership system is broken. For every Hasan who breaches the CNN threshold there are trees full of quiet monkeys swinging high in the branches, who fiddle around causing problems through mischief or incompetence. They do not win wars. They are toxic. They cause battles within the ranks. Too often these are real battles with hot bullets.
The Marines and other outfits, such as British combat units, and many of our Coalition partners, have seen tremendous amounts of combat with repeated deployments, yet the only place we see the zombie hunting and mass murder theme is with the US Army. Abu Ghraib was an “Army thing,” a horrible setback to the war, which cost uncountable American lives.
We do not see this with the Air Force, Marines, Navy, or Coast Guard. Surely they have events but their events are not a constant backdrop about who will be next to do something spectacularly insane or criminal, or give massively damaging secrets to Julian Assange at WikiLeaks.
Canadians, Aussies, Danish, Dutch, Poles, French, Italians, Spanish, Germans, and others saw significant combat in recent years—and took many KIA—yet their veterans are not committing wholesale slaughters or crushing their own national security.
The British saw great combat over the last decade. Do you recall a single mass murder by a British Soldier, who then latches onto PTSD as an excuse? The answer is no, because it has not happened.
I can personally vouch that British troops saw plenty of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. They were in the thick of battle and doing multiple tours that, in laymen’s terms, sucked.
British food was worse, their living conditions typically were far worse and more animalistic than Americans’, they got far more indirect fire, their gear was not as good, and they took heavy casualties, kept fighting, and did not commit mass murders in theatre or back home. Nor did the Aussies, nor did our US Marines, nor did anyone else. Only the US Army has this cultural tic.
Colonel David Williams, Canadian Air Force.
It is not as if foreign militaries or other branches are completely sparkling. Canadian base commander Colonel David Williams turned out to be a torturing serial murderer. He liked to photograph himself in underwear he stole from women. Colonial Williams made video while committing torture, rape and murder, and even adjusted the lights to help with taping. Colonel Williams is serving life in prison.
Colonel Williams had an average career, spent a little cush time overseas, and saw no combat. Multiple tours are not the genesis of the largest problems. With few exceptions like Williams, the greatest commonality between military zombies, the ones who truly go berserk and cause massive damage, is the US Army.
Amid all this pearl-clutching about troops’ mental health—and our reflexive nature to blame a sneeze on PTSD—is that many or most of the perpetrators never deployed, and most who did never saw combat, while many US Marines, British, and others saw significant combat over multiple tours yet are not “going postal” on a regular basis.
A simpler reality is that we stuffed too much sausage into Army uniforms and called the result “Soldiers.” We too often allow monkey business to pass as professionalism, but when monkeys are the graders, all grades pass.
Everyone gets a medal. Last year, Army Brigadier General Roger B. Duff was booted out for wearing a chest full of medals and awards he never earned. Imagine that. Stolen valor by an Army general. When is enough, enough? The Army effectively covered up the trial but some details leaked.
If a soldier cannot be trusted with the bolt to his weapon, a blank CD, a thumb drive, or keys to the kayaks, he should not be trusted with a Top Secret Clearance and computer terminal, and never with an automatic weapon. When a senior soldier, a gay-zombie hunter, takes young boys out onto a dark lake at night with no lights, using Army property, questions should be asked of the boys, their parents, and the Army.
Yet the Army turns its head, time and again. Taking bolts from Soldiers and then returning them to duty is common. Of course they are not sent on combat missions with disabled weapons, but some troops on bases in the wars carried disabled weapons, which was senseless given that the bases in war zones are awash with unimaginable killing tools.
The last tent in which I lived in Afghanistan sometimes contained enough plastic explosives to knock down a small dam. Grenades were everywhere. My tent-mates kept rifles and machine guns under their cots. There was more ammo than several men could carry. Taking a Soldier’s bolt in those circumstances is irrelevant. An unstable trooper should not be in those tents or on that base.
Not only should he not be on that base; any Soldier who cannot be trusted with his bolt or keys to the kayaks should not be in the Army, even if it means we have a shortfall in personnel.
Many Soldiers want to see the Army healthy, vibrant, and combat-ready. If not for them, I would not have all this inside scoop. They want positive change. Their heartbeat is strong. They are tired of the kookiness in their midst. They are tired of weak and morally repugnant leaders.
Big Monkey: What was I thinking?
High-ranking officers are being fired for demonstrable cause at a rate that is difficult to track.
Brigadier General Jeffrey Sinclair will soon face trial for rape, among other crimes. Details of his trial are practically X-rated. While Sinclair should have been focused on winning the Afghanistan war, he was undermining it. As for subordinates: Monkey see monkey do.
Many other high-ranking officers have been fired for misusing government property and various crimes. Much of it comes down to simple idiocy, like Brigadier General Roger Duff wearing his chest full of fraudulent awards. Only a true idiot would do that. Duff had been a Division Commander, implying that his entire Division would be suspect of monkey business.
Or Sinclair, and his obviously deranged captain-lover who had threatened suicide during their affair; they left a massive text-trail.
On a fine day in Afghanistan, this particular subordinate and lover was reading Sinclair’s emails (OPSEC…). She found emails to his wife and to other Army lovers. She went berserk and sent a poison email to another lover. All this while real Soldiers were in firefights down the road.
On the night of 19 March 2012, the captain lover stormed into the Kandahar office of Sinclair’s commander, Major General James Huggins. With tears streaming down her crazy cheeks, she put it on the table. She called an airstrike on Sinclair’s career, and on her own.
While the monkeys were having sex fights in Kandahar, 39 Coalition troops died that month, 40 the next, and 45 the next month, for a total of 402 in 2012.
Did these officers not have bigger things to consider? Sinclair was booted back to the United States to face trial.
The general has dug in like a tick and is fighting hard. Too bad he did not fight as hard in Afghanistan. Sinclair’s wife is sticking with him, possibly because if he gets busted to the slammer, his pension is gone. These cases often wreck families.
Four Generals have been selected for Sinclair’s jury. Their decision in Sinclair’s trial can affect their own careers. This is twisted like a tornado, especially since President Obama exercised unlawful command influence to sway the outcomes of military sex trials.
Ironically, Obama’s unlawful interference is making it easier to get away with military sex crimes. The judge in Sinclair’s case already has ruled that Obama’s statements, that military sex offenders should be, “prosecuted, stripped of their positions, court-martialed, fired, dishonorably discharged,” has tainted the cases. Judges in dozens of other cases have taken similar positions.
This high school drama unfolded in Kandahar while we were being shot at nearby. Soldiers are sick of the Sinclair and Duff-monkeys in the tree. The good Generals should declare war on monkey business. The Taliban is not a threat to US national security. Bad generals and soldiers are.
Last week, I asked the excellent and renowned author of The Generals, Thomas Ricks, about another 3-star general officer currently being investigated. Tom replied with the following:
“My biggest concern with this is the lack of transparency. Why are generals given special treatment when it comes to offenses? Arguably, because they are more senior, they should be held to a much higher standard, not a lower one.
“The real problem, I fear, is that generals are acting more like members of a union or guild protecting each other, rather than as stewards of their profession, enforcing standards for their subordinates and for each other.”
This is about a broken Army. If the Army is not yet broken, it needs to be broken and remade. It cannot fix itself.
- << Prev
- Next
Comments
Completely unlike the rule in Israel where anyone taking any youth group out MUST be armed. But, the situation there is a bit different then here.
For a jackass like Grisham to hold a Top Secret clearance makes a mockery of Army standards. When you look at the other examples cited in this article, you realize that the Army is asleep at the switch.
Hold someone responsible for once and fire the clueless Sergeant Major of the Army, a damned fool who hid out at the academy for most of the last ten years. Fire the Army Chief of Staff, a weak Armor commander with no combat experience.
Are there no better leaders to shepherd the Army? Take any Regimental Sergeant Major if the Ranger Regiment and put him in charge.
The Army needs new leadership. Responsible leadership.
Re the moniker for C Jones, though we do, indeed, have free speech as our right, I think you will understand how offensive this is. I'm not speaking of his comment, just his moniker. He thinks it's clever, of course. What it is is hatred in print. Would you allow F..k Jones? How about P.ss Jones? HIV Jones? Of course you wouldn't allow such references as those. This moniker is disgusting and should be called out!
The local Boy Scout organization ought to be SACKED for associating with this maniac! They are so paranoid about gays - this idiot is a clear and present danger to EVERYONE around him.
And yes, Texas lakes are quite dangerous at night - even WITH lights from drunken idiots motoring around at speed.
Where were the parents???
Bouncing an adult volunteer out is not a pleasant experience. And if the troop he is associated with has other military members in Scouting leadership positions who might be junior to Grisham in military terms- um- they might hesitate. Don't know the situation there, and don't know if anyone reading this would know.
Exactly. Standards were lowered to deal with the large scope of work in Iraq and Afghanistan. Standards for previous crimes, ASVAB testing, etc. And this is what you get, that addresses PART of the problem.
Why it's so hard for them to get rid of people that show obvious signs of trouble, is beyond me. I've seen it in every aspect of the Army, starting in boot camp. I'll never understand this mentality. We needed a fit, physically and mentally healthy fighting force. It was so far from that. I can't wrap my mind around it.
The higher ranking officers have always covered for one another, I've seen it first hand, it's like some unwritten code and they call it "discretion."
Very true statements, it starts at the top. What the Air Force just went through, the black eye they received from losing commanders over the boot camp sexual assaults, the Army needs to be next. Thank you for bringing attention to this, it's been an ongoing issue since I joined (2002) and I'm sure way before then.
They continue to do it because they can get away with it. And they know that. And our taxes will still pay for them to retire. That's crap.
This term is thematically similar to the newer word Fobbit which refers to non-combat arms soldiers who never leave their Forward Operating Base. Fobbit is a combination of the acronym FOB and term Hobbit from Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings series. Hobbits never leave the Shire, while Fobbits never leave the FOB. However, the terms are not synonymous because a functionary at the Pentagon might be termed a pogue or REMF (Rear Echelon Mother-Fucker) but could never be termed a Fobbit.
Seems Grisham cannot be trusted to make sound decisions as simple as ensuring the safety of Boy Scout under his care, thus he has no business with a security clearance. The AR-15 incident should have been a clear indication. Prior to that, the picture he posted of himself with the pistol with the bayonet on it speaks volumes as to his lack of judgement and mental instability.
His chain of command needs to revoke all clearances he has and out-process him for patterns of misconduct. (dishonorably)
The enlisted personnel I have met seem to act the same way. Those that feel they can make it in the civilian world are leaving. Most of the competent ones staying are those close to vesting their retirement.
Please, Mike, and all of us who love this "last, best hope of earth",...call Hal Moore, Pace, Blaber, McKnight and Luttrell, invoke the Spirit of Hack, eject the Perfumed Princes, the ticket-punchers , the feather-merchan ts, the pogues, and put the shooters and scooters, the snake-eaters, the "rough men", the "sheepdogs" in charge, restore the standards and fix our broken army.
5,000 years ago the Chinese wrote a book called The Art of War. In it they devote an entire chapter to the use of spies.
If men have understood the uses of spies, for 5000 years, evil too knows how to use spies.
The only thing evil needs to win, is for good people to do nothing.
Wish it wasn't true...
The manner in which the Military Leadership is not addressing these individuals is reminiscent of the Catholic Church shuffling around their Peodophiles. No one is left who can stand up and make a sound moral decision.
Where are his commanders?
Surely they know that he is engaged in questionable 2d Amendment activism?
Soldiers do not surrender their rights when they swear an oath, but it should not be permissible for soldiers to parade around with rifles on their back while they go about their daily business in town.
I understand that this is not technically illegal. I am not suggesting that it should be.
I do think that it is rude, very inconsiderate, very insensitive, to rub the collective faces of civilians into the mud of his public displays.
Grisham is making soldiers look like idiots. Grisham is making 2d Amendment advocates look stupid--much like that moron Adam Kokesh.
Where are Grisham's commanders?
Do we have to wait until this damaged soldier snaps and commits horrific crimes of violence before he is reined in?
Phillip McKreviss
Please let him go by the wayside and disappear, don't give him the attention that he is seeking so desperately. He has every right to carry the gun you see him with, but just because he is trying to make a point, IN OF ALL PLACES TEXAS, where the gun laws are pro gun, is asinine and immature shows that, you Michael, have the upper hand in intelligence and this isn't worthy of your time.
The same happened with Brigadier General Daniel Menard. Many people thought I spent too much time on Menard, when in reality I was being fed information like Niagara Falls. I was focused on other things but people were flooding me with verifiable information that I was not asking for. And that is Grisham's problem. So many people hate the guy that he cannot sneeze without someone telling me. I publish a small fraction. The allegation that he endangered the lives of Boy Scouts needs to be investigated by the Army and the Boy Scouts, if not law enforcement. I went live with that one due to the seriousness of the allegations including Boy Scouts.
Due to Grisham being surrounded by people who report his every move, I know more about his life than I care to. The information flows whether or not I ask.
{^_^}
I know several Army officers who have left active service because they could not take the ineptitude and BS anymore...one a Lt. Col.
This nation (including our command structure in DoD) is run by idiots.
Seriously though, great post and very thought provoking. Thank you for posting this
RSS feed for comments to this post